Legal Opinion

State v. Muhammad

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 25, 2004No. 2003-K-2991PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

875 So.2d 45 (2004)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

Mustafa H. MUHAMMAD.

No. 2003-K-2991.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 2004.

Charles C. Foti, Jr., Attorney General, Paul D. Connick, Jr., District Attorney, Terry M. Boudreaux, Counsel for Applicant.

Margaret S. Sollars, Thibodaux, Counsel for Respondent.

WEIMER, Justice.

This matter is before the court on the limited issue of whether a multiple offender adjudication must be completed prior to the defendant serving the sentence imposed on the underlying offense. We must also consider whether the holdings in the per curiam opinion of this court in State ex…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ross Milling Co. v. GilibertiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. State v. ReavesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  4. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  5. State Ex Rel. Williams v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. DauzartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. State v. GuillardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. State v. CollinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. State v. ZacharySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  5. State v. EllisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API