Commercial Acceptance Corp. v. Ruppel
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Defendants, Philip L. Ruppel and Mary V. Ruppel, husband and wife, executed a mortgage on real estate owned by them as tenants by entireties. The mortgage was accompanied by a bond in the usual form. Judgment was entered on the bond, by virtue of a warrant of attorney incorporated therein. The court below opened the judgment as to the wife. This appeal followed.
The husband purchased an automobile truck to use in his business, and the bond and mortgage were given to secure part of the purchase money. The court below correctly states: “The answer [to the petition to open the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Herr v. ReinoehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cooper v. Lucas Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Archbald v. Hood Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Conestoga National Bank v. Hallman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1933
- Norristown-Penn Trust Co. v. Woodhead, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1936
- Peoples-Pittsburgh Tr. Co. v. McCaffrey Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.