United States ex rel. Bowe v. Skeen
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
WATKINS, District Judge.
The petitioners are nine prisoners who have been convicted and sentenced by state courts and are now serving terms in the state penitentiary.. They filed a petition in this court to proceed in forma pauperis. Counsel were appointed to represent them, but because they did not choose to verify their status as paupers, they were required to pay the clerk’s filing fee of $5 and the marshal’s costs of serving the respondents. They paid the clerk’s fee but did not pay the marshal’s costs, and the respondents have therefore not been served with process. Since the filing of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Cook v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Adams v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- In re KosopudDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1920
- Pebley v. KnottsDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- Riley v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- In re SantiagoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- In Re Petition of Carlos SantiagoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Farley v. SkeenDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1952
- Mezzatesta v. State of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.