Legal Opinion
State v. Newell, Unpublished Decision (12-16-2004)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 16, 2004No. Case No. 84525UnpublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ACCELERATED DOCKET JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} This is an accelerated appeal. Defendant-appellant, Timothy Newell, pro se, appeals the judgment of the Common Pleas Court denying his Crim.R. 33 motion for an order that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering new evidence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
{¶ 2} In 1978, Newell was convicted in two separate jury trials. In the first case, he was charged with two counts of kidnapping, three counts of rape, two counts of felonious assault, and two counts of aggravated robbery. The jury found him guilty of both counts of kidnapping,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. OttenOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. Berry, 06ap-803 (5-10-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Cleveland, 08ca009406 (2-2-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. Hoover-MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. Willis, L-06-1244 (8-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.