Mitchell v. Reitz
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWalthall, J.
The statement of the nature and result of the suit in plaintiffs in error’s brief is substantially correct, and we adopt it, save and except such restatement as we may make as to the state of the proof, which will be made so far as deemed necessary in discussing the several propositions of plaintiffs in error, and defendant in error’s cross-assignments of error.
March 17, 1924, M. J. Reitz filed first amended original petition in the Pecos county district court, complaining of Edwin Mitchell, J. W. Grant, E. S. Wilson, D. E. Lindsey, and John O. Weden, and sought to recover certain lands,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. VelardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Chapman v. . the City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Towns v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1855
- Stephenson v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1874
- Dye v. CraryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.