Commonwealth v. Anderson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1ConcurrencePopovich, Judge
While I believe the prosecution’s misconduct bars retrial, this writer takes the opportunity to comment on the factual setting of the case for the purpose of giving courts of this Commonwealth some guidance in cases where prosecutorial *13misconduct has been alleged.1 This is consistent with the dictates of the United States Supreme Court as well as our own high Court that “ ‘appellate tribunals have the duty to make an independent evaluation of the circumstances[ ]” attendant to claims of prosecutorial misconduct (i.e., overreaching or bad faith). Commonwealth v. Cohen, 489 Pa. 167, 179, 413…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. PotterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. TolassiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.