Legal Opinion

Noland Co. v. Commercial Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1977No. 53329PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

The appellant materialman brought an action against the appellees to recover on a labor and material payment bond which designated the appellees as co-sureties, and the building general contractor as principal. The trial judge granted summary judgment for the appellees on the basis of their discharge by the appellant’s refusal to sue the principal subsequent to notice given pursuant to Code § 103-205, from which judgment the appellant appeals.

1. The appellant contends that Code § 103-205 is not applicable to the bond in question. Its argument is substantiálly as follows: The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Balboa Insurance v. A. J. Kellos Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Industrial Mechanical, Inc. v. Siemens Energy & Automation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Hendricks v. Blake & Pendleton, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Industrial Mechanical, Inc. v. Siemens Energy & Automation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API