Powers v. Lackey, Jr.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.
There is no concrete rule by which the existence of gross negligence can be determined, for each case must be judged according to .its own facts. Rich v. Hall, 107 Vt. 455, 459, 181 Atl. 113; Hall v. Royce, 109 Vt. 99, 104, 192 Atl. 193. When, as here, the question arises upon the defendant’s motion for directed verdict in an action based upon the provisions of P. L. 5113, the test is whether his conduct in the given situation was such that it can reasonably be inferred that it was the result of an indifference to his duty to his guest or an utter forgetfulness of the latter’s safety.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shaw, Admr. v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Sorrell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Palmer v. MarceilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Hall v. RoyceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Anderson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Williamson v. McKennaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Price v. State Highway CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
- Murray Ex Rel. Murray v. Pearson Appliance StoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- Conway v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Langdon-Davies v. StalbirdSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.