Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2002No. 37593Published

1ConcurrenceBecker, J.

I agree with the majority that petitioner’s due process rights were compromised in the application of the Nevada marriage consent statute. I write separately to make two points.

First, petitioner’s separate attack claiming that the district court abused its discretion with regard to the merits of the petition to approve his daughter’s marriage, standing alone, was rendered moot by the subsequent marriage of his daughter pursuant to the district- court’s order. This is because, until attacked, the district court’s order enjoyed presumptive validity and the marriage was likewise presumptively…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API