Legal Opinion

United States v. Harris

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 2004No. CR. 03-244-03PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SCHWAB, District Judge.

As Justice Sandra Day O’Connor stated in her dissent in Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), it is difficult to read the majority opinion of Justice Antonin Scalia without coming to the conclusion that the United States Sentencing Guidelines are unconstitutional. This is the conclusion reached by most, although certainly not all, federal courts to have considered the issue. 1

While not conceding that a decision striking down Washington’s sentencing scheme would necessarily invalidate the United States Sentencing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. Freddie J. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Francisco D. Pineiro, Also Known as Frank PineiroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. JohnsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004
  4. Lewis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API