Legal Opinion

Haizlett v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1952No. Appeal, No. 52Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

This action of assumpsit on a written contract of burglary and robbery insurance was brought to recover the value of articles stolen and for damage to the premises of plaintiff’s service station. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, and after its motions for a new trial and judgment n.o.v. were discharged by the court below, the defendant took this appeal.

*600The parties entered into the contract in question in June 1944, at which time plaintiff was engaged in business as proprietor of a gasoline and oil service station in Cochran ton, Crawford County. Because of war'…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sirhan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API