Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Kirby

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1895No. 17,493PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Erom the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, C. J.

An abstract of the pleadings, as set .out in the appellants’ brief, and as admitted to be correct by appellee, shows substantially, that the action was by appellee against appellants, his minor children, to quiet title to real estate.

A guardian ad litem was appointed for appellants and -tiled an answer, and also a cross-complaint, to each of which a demurrer was sustained. This ruling is assigned as error.. The facts stated in the answer and in the cross-complaint are the same, and are briefly as follows:

That Clay M. Kirby, who was the father of appellee, and the grandfather of appellants,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Earle v. EarleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Nealis v. DicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Brown v. GroveIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Brake v. PayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Richards v. RichardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cotterell v. KoonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Burnett v. MilnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Alsmeier v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Bruce v. OsgoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. In Re Paternity of TompkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API