Schulz v. People

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was convicted of possessing a still, contrary to section 1, c. 80, p. 220, L. 1925 (effective May 11th, 1925), and sentenced to the penitentiary for two and one-half to five years. To review that judgment he brings error and asks that the writ be made a supersedeas.

Defendant’s only contention here is that the judgment is unsupported by the evidence, and in this we think he is right. The information charged that on July 31, 1925, he did “unlawfully, knowingly and feloniously have in his' possession a still, used, designed and intended…