Legal Opinion

Langworthy v. Crissey

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action to recover on a promissory note. Tried at the Chautauqua Circuit and verdict directed for the plaintiff. Motion by defendant for a new trial heard upon the judge’s minutes.

1Opinion of the CourtWabd, J.

The plaintiff sought to recover upon a promissory note executed and delivered by the defendant to Cornelia Langworthy in 1885 for $448, payable to her order.

The plaintiff is the son of Cornelia Langworthy; the defendant is her son-in-law. She lived about two miles from Sinclairville in Chautauqua county. Mrs. Rosina Love, who resided at Sinclairville, was her sister-in-law. About September 1, 1891, Mrs. Langworthy went to Sinclairville and delivered the note, without indorsing it, to Mrs. Love, saying in effect that it was for the plaintiff; that she wanted him to have it; that he was poor…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Greene v. . GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Grymes v. . HoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Hathaway v. . PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. Westerlo v. . De WittNew York Court of Appeals · 1867

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. JolleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Carlon v. RyanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1911
  3. Langworthy v. CresseyNew York Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API