Legal Opinion
Tureck v. George
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 28, 1997No. 14927PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The named plaintiff1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying him prejudgment interest from the date of the plaintiffs offer of judgment, filed subsequent to the granting of his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, until the time of the plaintiffs acceptance of the defendants’ offer of judgment.
The controlling issue in this appeal is whether the words “after trial,” as used in General Statutes § 52-192a (b),2 should be inteipreted to mean after a motion *156for summary judgment has been granted only as to the issue of liability. The plaintiff argues that the word…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. SpearsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Connecticut Water Co. v. BeausoleilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rocque v. Northeast Utilities Service Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Reid v. LandsbergerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Schiappa v. FerreroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Przekopski v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Tureck v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.