Legal Opinion

Damron v. State Compensation Commissioner

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1930No. 6822PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Judge:

This claim was disallowed by the commissioner on the ground that the injury complained of by the claimant “did not occur in the course of and resulting from the employment. ’ ’

The undisputed facts are that claimant, Attie Damron, was admitted to the employ of the Buffalo Creek Coal & Coke Company as a coal loader on September 26,1927, but, due to a shortage of men, he was put to work that evening as a helper on a cutting machine. Upon coming out of the mine at about four o ’clock the next morning, he went to the electric shop or motor barn which was located about sixty feet…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holt Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Guiliano v. Daniel O'Connell's SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Colucci v. Edison Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  4. Kincannon v. OttWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Dixon v. AndrewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Emmel v. State Compensation DirectorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Staubs v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Ball v. Joy Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1990
  4. Partlow v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Bilchak v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API