Legal Opinion

Covert Township v. Consumers Power Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1996No. Docket 183669PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner appeals as of right a February 21, 1995, order of the Michigan Tax Tribunal granting respondent’s motion for summary disposition on the ground that petitioner did not have standing to file the petition and invoke the jurisdiction of the tribunal. We affirm.

Petitioner contractually engaged the State Tax Commission (STC) to appraise and determine the true cash value (TCV) of the Palisades nuclear plant for the purpose of establishing the 1994 assessed valuation of the plant. Respondent Consumers Power Company is the owner of the plant. The STC assessed the plant at the State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Consumers Power Co. v. Big Prairie TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Midland Cogeneration Venture Ltd. Partnership v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Grace Petroleum Corp. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Parkview Memorial Ass'n v. City of LivoniaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Richland Township v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spartan Stores, Inc v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Walgreen Co. v. MacOmb TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Walgreen Co. v. MacOmb TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API