Legal Opinion

Fletcher R. Williams v. Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1971No. 24916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant petitioned for a writ of ha-beas corpus. He contended that California State sentences, ordered to run concurrently with federal sentences, require the removal of a detainer placed by the State of California against appellant, now in federal custody. The district court denied relief. We affirm.

We reach the merits without considering possible procedural infirmities, which might likewise call for an affirmance. In Re Patterson (1966) 64 Cal.2d 357, 362, 49 Cal.Rptr. 801, 804, 411 P.2d 897, 900, disposes of the case. The court said:

“The sole purpose of transferring defendant to Texas in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Thomas J. Bullock, III v. State of Mississippi, Joe Patterson, Attorney General, State Board of Parole, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Gottfried v. CroninSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Gaches v. THIRD JUDICIAL DIST., ETC., STATE OF UTAHDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Graves v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  5. Moore v. State of MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API