Legal Opinion
Giddens v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided October 3, 1991No. 13-90-398-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HINOJOSA, Justice.
The trial court granted forfeiture of $103,653.00 in U.S. currency, which the State had alleged was derived from, used for, or intended to be used for the distribution, delivery, or sale of a controlled substance in violation of Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 4476-15, § 5.03 (Vernon Supp.1989) (repealed). By one point of error, appellant contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because the State failed to timely allege that the seizure occurred in Nueces County, Texas, a fact essential to the trial court’s jurisdiction. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peek v. Equipment Service Co. of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. Benavides, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Castleberry v. Goolsby Building Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Huston v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1983
- Smith v. Texas Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Taiwan Shrimp Farm Village Ass'n v. U.S.A. Shrimp Farm Development, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
- Henke v. Peoples State Bank of Hallettsville, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- Lee v. El Paso County, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
- $217,590.00 in United States Currency v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- Dorchester Master Ltd. Partnership v. Dorchester Hugoton, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.