Legal Opinion

NACO, Inc. v. Marenga

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 10, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

*37In this action for breach of a contract to provide public adjustment services in regard to defendant Marenga’s fire insurance claim, plaintiff NACO, Inc., doing business as National Adjustment Co., alleges that Marenga failed to compensate it at the agreed upon rate of 6% of the claim proceeds. Marenga in turn claimed that NACO’s representative, Steven Gilbert, solicited the contract outside the hours permitted by Insurance Law § 2108 (p) and its implementing regulations, that the contract papers were facially…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schozer v. William Penn Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Jones v. HartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Ochocinska v. National Fire Adjustment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API