Legal Opinion

Flanagan Lumber Co. v. Tennison

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 22, 2014No. 2120911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Judge.

The Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”), § 25-5-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975, requires an employer to pay for an “other apparatus” that is reasonably necessary for treating an employee’s injury resulting from an accident arising out of and in the course of the employment. See § 25-6-77(a), Ala.Code 1975. This appeal raises the question whether, under the particular facts of this case, a walk-in bathtub qualifies as an “other apparatus” under the Act. We conclude that it does not; thus, we reverse the judgment of the Limestone Circuit Court (“the trial court”).

Facts and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Edwards v. Jesse Stutts, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  4. Continental Cas. Ins. Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Ex Parte ValdezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Entrekin v. LasseterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API