Legal Opinion

People v. Mostert

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 9, 1976No. 74-270PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stengel

Defendant, Michael Mostert, was convicted of bribery following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of McDonough County. He was sentenced to pay a fine of $300, and placed on two years’ probation, conditioned on first serving 30 days in the county jail. The issues presented in this appeal are (1) whether the bribery statute is unconstitutionally vague, (2) whether the trial court improperly refused to give an instruction requested by defendant, (3) whether certain comments in the prosecutor’s closing argument were improper and (4) whether, the sentence was excessive.

The sole witness at the trial…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. BoltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. People v. EdwardsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. People v. SuttonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. People v. McPhersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. People v. EdwardsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API