Legal Opinion

State v. Coffee

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

Defendant was found guilty upon an information charging him with working’, and permitting those in his employ to labor, on Sunday, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $10. Defendant has appealed.

Defendant’s first point is that the trial court erred in over-ruling defendant’s motion to quash the information, the material part of which is as follows: ‘ ‘ George D. Sloan, prosecuting attorney within and for Ripley County, based on the affidavit of Charlie Young, herewith filed and upon his oath of office, informs' the court that C. L‘. Coffee, at and in the County of Ripley and' State…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. DipleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. State v. HuffmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. State v. PittmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  4. State v. OhmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. State v. BoydSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LondeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. State v. LundrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API