Legal Opinion

Milke v. Mroz

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 11, 2014No. 1 CA-SA 14-0108PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORRIS, GEMMILL, SWANN, Judges:

¶ 1 Debra Jean Milke petitions this court for special action review of the superior court’s denial of her motion to dismiss the capital charges against her. She alleges a retrial would violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Arizona Constitution because of the State’s longstanding breaches of its constitutional duty to disclose impeachment evidence. In this extraordinary ease, we agree. The State committed egregious prosecutorial misconduct that severely prejudiced Milke’s defense, and nearly a quarter-century passed before the misconduct was fully…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Milke v. Phoenix, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  2. ROBBINS v. STATECourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
  3. State v. NashCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. THOMAS (LACY) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2017
  5. THOMAS (LACY) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API