City of Jefferson v. Trustees of Martin Institute
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The first question for consideration is the ruling of the court sustaining the general demurrer to count 2 of the plaintiffs’ petition. Whether the allegations relating to dedication, which are substantially the same as those contained in the first count, are sufficient to set forth a cause of action for the realty or the proceeds of the insurance policies, need not, in view of the ruling hereinafter made, be determined. Assuming but not deciding that, standing alone, they would be sufficient, yet, the same count sets forth the terms of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. HornsbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Grizzard v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Keith v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Bullard v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Cody v. QuartermanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Adler v. Leopold Adler CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- First Nat. Bank of Polk County v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Hargrove v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- MARILYN MONIQUE HARRISON v. JAMES C. HARRISON, JR.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2023