Legal Opinion

Clow v. Plummer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Edget, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The plaintiff is a resident of the state of New York, and is the widow of Charles Clow, deceased.

The action is trover, brought in the Saginaw circuit court, to recover from the defendant the value of two-thirds of the pine timber cut and removed by him from lands in Ogemaw county, and manufactured into lumber. Defendant resides in Saginaw county. The verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff in the court- below for about 83,200. Defendant brings the case here by writ of error.

The plaintiff claims to be a tenant in common with the defendant of the lands from which the timber was taken. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Besancon v. BrownsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Aldine Manufacturing Co. v. BarnardMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Heinmiller v. HathewayMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grant v. FletcherDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
  2. Sullivan v. SherryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hennes v. Charles Hebard & SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Mower v. VerplankeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People v. SpearsMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API