Legal Opinion

Ledford v. Farrow

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 22, 1975No. 50290PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

1. "Where it was sought to have the court of ordinary revoke and set aside the probate of a will in solemn form, on the petition of one who had been served and was a party to the proceedings to admit the will to probate, such application...” was timely "made within three years from the rendering of the judgment sought to be vacated.” Speer v. Speer, 74 Ga. 179 (1).

2. The appeal to the superior court from the final judgment of the court of ordinary denying the caveatrix’ motion to set aside the judgment of probate, was a de novo investigation, in which both parties were entitled…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Speer v. SpeerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Touchton v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Royal Atlanta Development Corp. v. StaffieriCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Hooper v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Clark v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Whatley v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API