Zuniga v. State

Ricardo Zuniga, appellant, was convicted of two counts of engaging in organized criminal activity and one count of capital murder based on his participation in a shooting that caused the deaths of two *731individuals. On appeal, he argued that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions for engaging in organized criminal activity because the record failed to show that he committed the shootings while possessing the intent to establish, maintain, or participate "as a member of a criminal street gang."1 Agreeing with appellant's argument, the court of appeals vacated his convictions…