Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Raintree Homes, Inc. v. Village of Long Grove

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 15, 2009No. 2-06-1105Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Bowman

I agree with the majority that the Village of Long Grove (Village) did not have the statutory authority to impose impact fees for schools and open space and that the ordinances imposing such fees are thus invalid. I respectfully disagree, however, with the majority’s conclusion that Raintree paid the impact fees under duress because there was a business compulsion to pay them. In my opinion, Raintree paid the impact fees voluntarily, which means that the voluntary-payment doctrine precludes recovery of those fees.

Under the voluntary-payment doctrine, money voluntarily paid on a claim of right…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. Prime Cable of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Getto v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Ross v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Rosen v. Village of Downers GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Geary v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API