Legal Opinion
United States v. Austin
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 29, 2018No. 16-3211PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Flaum, Circuit Judge.
Near the end of his jury trial, Keith Austin pleaded guilty to three counts of bank fraud, aggravated identity theft, and obstruction of justice. Austin now protests that his plea was not knowing and voluntary because the district court did not adequately discuss the Sentencing Guidelines and did not mention forfeiture. He also takes issue with the court's denial of the reduction for acceptance of responsibility and the use of the incorrect Guidelines range, as well as the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the district court's loss calculation, restitution amount,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. SuraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. UseniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Grayson Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Korrtel FilzenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Carmona v. City Of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- United States v. AustinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- United States v. Douglas M. VeachCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.