Legal Opinion

Hempel v. Heckscher

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

If this were an action on an ordinary commercial contract there could be no question that plaintiff would be entitled to examine the defendant before trial as to at least some of the paragraphs of the notice. Defendant’s denial that he made the contract sued upon would not deprive plaintiff of the right and opportunity to examine him orally on that point. Indeed it is only a,s to allegations that are put in issue that a party can, as a rule, examine his adversary. The fact that plaintiff may have personal knowledge as to the subject-matter of the examination would be equally ineffective to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wessel v. SchwarzlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. La Fourrure v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roth v. PatinoNew York Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API