Legal Opinion

Oasis Legal Finance Group v. Coffman, Colorado Attorney General

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 16, 2015No. Supreme Court Case 13SC497PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hood

{1 Petitioners are national litigation finance companies. They buy interests in the potential proceeds of personal injury cases by executing agreements with tort plaintiffs to whom the companies provide money while the cases are pending (typically, less than $1,500). By the terms of the agreements, the money cannot be used to prosecute the legal claims. Instead, the plaintiffs are supposed to use the funds to pay personal expenses while waiting for their lawsuits to settle or go to trial.

1 2 In exchange, the plaintiffs agree to pay the companies a sum of money from the future litigation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. DiazSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  2. Westin Operator, LLC v. GrohSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  3. People v. BenavidezColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Tulips Investments, LLC v. State of Colorado ex rel.Suthers, Colorado Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  5. Wilson v. Ross Investment CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lewis v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  2. Fast Trak Investment Co. v. Richard SaxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Oasis Legal Finance Group, LLC v. Coffman, Colorado Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  4. Sandstrom v. SolenColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Colorado Republican Party v. WilliamsColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API