Legal Opinion

Ridenour v. Lile

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1952No. 937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAhl, J.

Plaintiff in the trial court instituted an action against the defendant on an account, claiming there was due him from the defendant the sum of $1,764.24, with interest from April 25, 1951, for seven oows sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant.

To this petition, defendant filed an answer and cross-petition.

Defendant’s answer denies each and every allegation in plaintiff’s petition.

For his cross-petition, defendant adopts the allegations of his answer, and alleges that on April 25,1951, plaintiff sold at a public sale held on plaintiff’s farm near London, Ohio, certain cows which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Klein v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  2. McLean v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Kenny v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. McAtee v. Western & Southern Life Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Krueger v. Schoenling Brewing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bushey v. FrenchNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Marr v. NagelNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API