Legal Opinion

Brownson v. Fenwick

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 15, 1841PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Westeen Dis. APPEA! FEOM THE COUET OF THE FIFTH JIISTEICT FOE THE PAEISII OF ST< MAETIN, THE JUDGE OF THE SEVENTH FEESIDING. This is an action to recover $575, the amount of a promissory note signed by the defendant, with 10 per cent, interest; and also $829 95, advanced to the defendant with other funds, to purchase slaves.

Read the full summary

Westeen Dis. APPEA! FEOM THE COUET OF THE FIFTH JIISTEICT FOE THE PAEISII OF ST< MAETIN, THE JUDGE OF THE SEVENTH FEESIDING. This is an action to recover $575, the amount of a promissory note signed by the defendant, with 10 per cent, interest; and also $829 95, advanced to the defendant with other funds, to purchase slaves. The plaintiff alleges, that on defendant’s return from Mary» land, he informed petitioner, that he had purchased a slave named Dennis, from the estate of Leo Fenwick, for $800, who |ja(j ma¿e j^g escape an¿ run away; 0n coming to Louisiana, an¿ petitioner was induced from…

1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.

The plaintiff sues to recover the amount of a promissory note, which is not contested, and the further sum of $829 95, Upon the following allegations. That in 1835 he employed the defendant as his agent, to purchase for him in Maryland a *434'certain number of slaves, and furnished him funds for that puf¿ p0se< ¿efen¿ant purchased several slaves for him* aild paid for them with his funds, and on his return to Louisiana delivered them to him, informing him in the meantime, that a certain negro man, named Dennis, whom he said he had purchased for the plaintiff of the estate of Leo Fenwick, had made…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meeks v. Huntington School, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Jamison v. LudlowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
  3. Willis v. KernSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API