Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Arthur P. Tranakos, Esq.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 9, 1981No. 79-1754PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Upon due consideration, Arthur P. Tranakos, Esq. is hereby suspended indefinitely from practice before this court.

After a reasonable length of time has expired, if Mr. Tranakos can demonstrate to this court that he is knowledgeable regarding the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the rules of this court, and that he will abide by the orders of this court promptly and diligently, this court will consider lifting the suspension; Provided, That, as to the five (5) cases pending in this court in which he is counsel for the appellants, he may present oral argument and participate in…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stuart Hamblen v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. In re Judicial MisconductUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  3. Castillo v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1992
  4. Yagman v. Republic InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1991
  5. Matter of DempseyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API