Legal Opinion

Informal Opinion No.

New York Attorney General Reports

Decided February 14, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

John M. Reed, Esq. Town Attorney, Pawling and Pleasant Valley

You state that Article 78 proceedings are frequently brought against your town challenging its determinations in cases involving special use permits, variances, subdivisions, and other zoning matters. Your question is whether the town board may provide for the affected town agency to condition approval of these permits, variances, etc. upon the agreement of the applicant to reimburse the town for its legal expenses, including attorney's fees, costs and disbursements, in the event of an Article 78 proceeding brought by neighbors or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dexter v. Town BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Summit School v. NeugentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Conmar Builders, Inc. v. Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Peckham Industries, Inc. v. RossNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Peckham Industries, Inc. v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API