Legal Opinion
Steiner Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Weinreb
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 11, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In response to plaintiff Steiner Sports’s action to enforce a covenant not to compete, allegedly signed by defendant Weinreb, and to prohibit Weinreb from working for other employers in the sports marketing industry, Weinreb asserted counterclaims for tortious interference with prospective economic relationships and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Weinreb alleged that Steiner Sports had caused one of its clients, The Nelson Group, to rescind an offer of employment to him, unless Steiner Sports consented to the employment in writing, for the sole purpose of harming him. Weinreb…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Howell v. New York Post Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Carvel Corp. v. NoonanNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- MBIA Insurance v. Greystone & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Freedman v. PearlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SRS Enters., Inc. v. Rosemex, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Wolberg v. IAI N. Am., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018