Legal Opinion
Haimovitz v. Robb
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided December 20, 1937PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
The appeal brings for review the final decree in favor of the complainant in a suit the purpose of which, was to compel specific performance of contract to convey certain real estate and to adjudicate compensation for any deficiency in the subject matter of the contract.
The appellant has stated what he terms to be five questions to be determined by this Court. The questions as presented in nowise comply with amended Rule 20. The five questions as stated might be restated as one, “Was the evidence sufficient to support the decree ?”
The appellee has stated seven questions, all of which can. be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frissell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Knox v. SprattSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
- Myers v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Behrman v. MaxSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Harris Et Ux. v. RequaSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- CU Associates, Inc. v. RB Grove, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Gore v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Glave v. BrandleinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Savage v. MacY's East, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Hoshaw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.