Legal Opinion
In re the Provision of Basic Generation Service
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 10, 2011PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaVECCHIA
The central issue in this appeal is the procedural claim by the Department of the Public Advocate, Division of Rate Counsel (Rate Counsel), that the Board of Public Utilities (BPU) failed to comply with basic notice and opportunity for comment obligations before taking an action, by administrative order, that paved the way for potentially $50 million in increased energy supplier costs to be passed through to ratepayers. Rate Counsel claims that by conflating two separate proceedings, the BPU lost sight of its duty to provide interested parties with fair notice that the agency was considering…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Bergen Pines County Hospital v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Texter v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- In Re the Request for Solid Waste Utility Customer ListsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ardan v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
- North Jersey Media Group, Inc. v. Township of LyndhurstNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Messick v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- In re Authorization for Freshwater Wetlands Statewide General Permit 6New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- In the Matter of County of Atlantic and Pba Local 243 AndNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.