Legal Opinion
Hollingsworth v. King
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided June 25, 1991No. 07-90-0105-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYD, Justice.
Appellants George Bedford Hollings-worth and May Hollingsworth (the Holl-ingsworths) suffered a collision between an automobile driven by them and a horse belonging to appellees Pete and Bonnie King (the Kings). In this suit, they alleged the collision was caused by the Kings’ failure to properly fence the horse and lock the gates. In response to the Kings’ motion arguing they had no duty to fence the horse in, the trial court summarily dismissed the Hollingsworths’ suit to recover damages allegedly resulting from the collision. In one point, the Hollingsworths assert the trial…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Otis Engineering Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Turner v. Big Lake Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Levesque v. Wilkens, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Gibbs v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Fields v. City of Texas CityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Gette v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Metro Fuels, Inc. v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.