Legal Opinion

Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Beach

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1987No. 63887PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon

In construing either a trust or a will the challenge is to find the settlor’s or testator’s intent and, provided that the intention is not against public policy, to give it effect. (See Hull v. Adams (1948), 399 Ill. 347, 352.) Courts search for intent by analyzing both the words used in the instrument and the circumstances under which they were drafted, including: “the state of the testator’s property, his family, and the like.” (Armstrong v. Barber (1909), 239 Ill. 389, 404.) When, however, the instrument fails to make the settlor’s or testator’s intention clear, courts often resort to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. BarberIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Knight v. PottgieserIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Dollander v. DhaemersIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Hull v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Chicago Title and Trust Co. v. SteinitzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. In Re Estate of FeinbergIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Coussee v. Estate of EfstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Tuttle v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. (In re Tuttle)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019
  5. Continental Bank, N.A. v. HerguthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API