Legal Opinion

Charmin Watson v. Landmark Urology, P.S.C.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2022No. 2020 SC 0587Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

RENDERED: MARCH 24, 2022 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2020-SC-0587-DG CHARMIN WATSON AND APPELLANTS STEPHEN WATSON ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS V. NO. 2019-CA-1271 SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT NO. 14-CI-00771 LANDMARK UROLOGY, P.S.C. AND APPELLEES AMBERLY KAY WINDISCH, M.D. OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE VANMETER AFFIRMING Prior to performing a medical procedure, a health care provider is generally required to obtain the patient’s informed consent. In Kentucky, the requirements for informed consent are established by statute. KRS1 304.40- 320. The issue we resolve in this case is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Sargent v. ShafferKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Grand Aerie Fraternal Order of Eagles v. CarneyhanKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Pearson Ex Rel. Trent v. National Feeding Systems, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Kovacs v. FreemanKentucky Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API