Meyer v. Clark Oil Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Dissent
BRUCE NORMILE, Special Judge,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. In my view: First, the argument permitted was prejudicial error; Second, the general objection to the improper argument was sufficient under the circumstances of the case; and Third, the improper argument constituted plain error under Civil Rule 84.13(c).
In this case plaintiff’s brother was killed as a result of an automobile accident wherein defendant Davis operated the other vehicle. Defendant Clark was Davis’ employer. Plaintiff was 29 years old and the decedent was 24 years old. They were the only children of deceased…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Gaydos v. DomabylSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Hungate v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- Stanziale v. MusickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Kaelin v. NuelleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.