Legal Opinion

Colla v. Town of Hanover

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 27, 2006No. 2005-217PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

The plaintiffs, Stanley and Judith Colla, appeal the order of the Superior Court (Houran, J.) dismissing their appeal of a decision by the Town of Hanover Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA). We reverse and remand.

The record supports the following facts. The plaintiffs applied to the ZBA for three variances to build additions to their existing residence. The ZBA granted two and denied one of the variance requests. The denied request was for an area variance to the side setback requirements so that the plaintiffs could build a screened deck on the north side of their home. The ZBA denied this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Estate of KingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. Harrington v. Town of WarnerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. Wilder v. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. Boccia v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  5. McDonald v. Town of Effingham Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. ACAS Acquisitions (Precitech) Inc. v. HobertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  2. Blagbrough Family Realty Trust v. a & T Forest Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Appeal of Omega Entertainment, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  4. Robinson v. Town of HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  5. Churchill Realty Trust v. City of Dover Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API