Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brittany Morrow v. Barry Balaski

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 5, 2013No. 11-2000Published

1ConcurrenceSmith, Circuit Judge

I join Chief Judge McKee’s well-reasoned majority opinion in its entirety. I write separately only to explain the limited circumstances under which I believe we may overrule one of our prior en banc decisions.

“Stare decisis should be more than a fine-sounding phrase.” Oregon ex rel. State Land Bd. v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co., 429 U.S. 363, 394, 97 S.Ct. 582, 50 L.Ed.2d 550 (1977) (Marshall, J„ dissenting). Yet it is nothing more than that if it does not require us, in the ordinary course, to adhere to a precedent with which we disagree. And even sitting en banc, we do not conduct a plenary…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API