Barsh v. Mullins

I cannot agree with the majority opinion. As I read it, it mentions two considerations which may militate against upholding the verdict and judgment against Roy Barsh, d/b/a Barsh Truck Line and Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corporation. I use the words “considerations” instead of “reasons”, and “may” instead of “do”, because one of them is mentioned only inferentially, or abstractly, in discussing the case of Bradley v. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co., 184 *853Okl. 51, 84 P.2d 629, in the following words:

"The unlawful use of the truck was said to be a mere condition and not a contributing cause of the…