Legal Opinion

Osborn v. Cloud

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 11, 1866PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Polh District Court The appeal in tbis case is brought to reverse a ruling of the District Court upon a motion made by the defendant to set aside a sheriff’s sale of a judgment, levied on by virtue of a writ of attachment.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

practice: eet asme a sale I. The purchaser of the judgment at the sheriff’s sale was not the execution plaintiff or party thereto, and was not made a party to the motion to set the sale aside, nor was he served with notice of the motion, nor did he appear thereto. Even if a sheriff’s sale may be set aside on motion when the purchaser is a third person, not a party to or interested in the execution, it certainly cannot be done, so as to *239affect the right of such purchasers, without giving him notice of such motion. It was error therefore to set aside the sale without notice to the purchaser,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. LeclaireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  2. Ritter v. HenshawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  3. County of Polk ex rel. School Fund v. SypherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. Cline v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1820
  5. Lyster v. BrewerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Iowa Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ChaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. State ex rel. Thatcher v. Justice Court of Reno TownshipNevada Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Ewing v. Wilson & HowellTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Bank of Horton v. KnoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API