Legal Opinion

State v. Sorsby

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 16, 2005No. CR-04-2166PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The State of Alabama filed this petition for a writ of mandamus directing Judge David N. Lichtenstein to grant the State’s motion to dismiss William Kenneth Sors-by’s appeal for a trial de novo. On March 8, 2005, Sorsby pleaded guilty in the Jefferson District Court to driving under the influence.1 On March 11, 2005, Sorsby filed a notice of appeal for a trial de novo in the Jefferson Circuit Court. On July 14, 2005, the State moved that the appeal be dismissed because, it argued, the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to consider the appeal in that when he pleaded guilty Sorsby did not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Lefkowitz v. NewsomeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. North v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. State v. BallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SorsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Ex Parte SorsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Ex Parte State of AlabamaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  4. State v. SorsbyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API