Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Bell

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 15, 1989No. 88-2167PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the rule of Langley v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., 484 U.S. 86, 108 S.Ct. 396, 98 L.Ed.2d 340 (1987), applies to an alleged failure to disclose a material fact. We hold that it does, and therefore the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is *65entitled to the shield provided by 12 U.S.C. § 1823(e).

Oklahoma Refining Company (ORC), an Oklahoma general partnership, owned and operated two oil refineries and a pipeline system. The partners of ORC were An-Son Transportation Company, which held a 66% share, and Atex Refining…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Plaintiff-Counterclaim v. Ray Bell Atex Oil Company Atex Oil Company of Texas Atex Stations, Inc. Atex Refining Company Anderson-Prichard Pipe Line Corporation Atex Oil Company of Oklahoma Inc. Anson Pipeline Co. Anson Refining Co. Atex Pipeline Co. And Oklahoma Pipeline Co., Oklahoma Pipeline Co. Atex Pipeline Co. And Atex Oil Company of Oklahoma Inc., Defendants-Third-Party and Meridith R. Sheets, Inc. v. Trudy Perry, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Avirez, Ltd. v. Resolution Trust Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1995
  3. Resolution Trust Corp. v. DaviesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  4. Equity Bank v. SchneiderDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
  5. McCullough v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API