Legal Opinion

Seffens v. Muradian

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1994No. Docket 5,094PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanhoe, J.

This appeal involves the interpretation of the provisions of PA 1965, No 198, § 8 (MCLA § 257.1108 [Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 9.2808]), known as the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act. An amendatory act, PA 1968, No 223, was adopted after the occurrence of the events giving rise to this appeal and does not affect our decision herein.

Appellant, Secretary of State, director of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund, was served with copies of the summons and complaint as required by § 5 * of the aforementioned act, but he did not intervene in the suit in the action in circuit court. On November 13,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Frey v. IslasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API